|
Categories
Latest Postings
Links
|
Buzzword: “CPM” and “BPM”
Corporate Performance Management (CPM) and Business Performance Management (BPM) have gained significant visibility in the past 5 years. Although there are purists that would argue these are different, I’m lumping them together because from an consumer perspective I don’t think there are appreciable differences. Dashboards have also gotten a lot of press recently, and often gets lumped into the CPM discussion. But I see dashboards as an implementation option within a larger CPM initiative. So what is CPM/BPM? Essentially, it’s using metrics and KPIs to measure and improve the business. A successful CPM solution must be driven from the executive ranks down through the business to technology. It’s DOA if it starts in IT, and has little chance when germinating within a particular business unit such as Finance. The reason for this is simple: the goal of CPM is to improve the business by taking measurements at various levels (starting at the top), setting thresholds, and managing to exceptions. Now I don’t necessarily agree with this approach to running a business, particularly if this is presented as the silver bullet. This approach often fosters a very reactive culture within the business, but coupled with executive direction and sponsorship, and properly defined non-punitive measures, CPM can provide significant visibility into the operations of the organization. That being said, I can’t stress enough the importance of not driving this from the IT side of the house. Particularly insidious is the temptation to follow vendor claims of implementing a CPM solution (usually just a tricked out dashboard). If the executive suite doesn’t buy in and drive this, the technical solution is a moot point.
Leave a ReplyYou must be logged in to post a comment. |